|
Post by xiaojuzi on Aug 9, 2007 21:59:23 GMT -5
Hee Sweviking - why would talking about occ bugs - spoil talking about other bugs ? And yes spy is major problem in any gamestyle, not only cos it is an undetectable scout, but also cos your opponent will be able to check your strat, ending up making any new strats puplic, not leaving any room for people to do their own thinking. I find that to be the longterm BUG of them all. We need either an antispy unit, or a no spy setup choice couldent aggree more (infact allready covered in another tread) Ping got a tread off its own too, allready said that its a must, no need to play teamers if y cant comunicate. Native America. Dont know excatly what y saying there, but if y talking AXE without resourses, yes that is tough, but is it better than mali archer ? And now back to the OCC, read the hole thing, and y will find out that quit a few people is interested ! Personaly i like all gamestyles, but the thing is that very few people want to play anythink but ANC,ANC & ANC. So the only way i can play ladder in the later parts of the game is by playing OCC. In our noob clan we have manged to get a few ren era ctons and a few late era teamers going, but generaly if y join the open LADDER games, they all start in either Anc or if y lucked a medival teamer. the main reason for those who love playing anc is there is more strategic variables in an Anc start: have a warrior rush or build worker on population1,design the adapted tec route,build stonehenge without building any units then expand like nuts or halt suddenly then pump out enough units to rush,oracle construction then slave all cities to level 1 ,cata rush,oracle feudalism then choke,the risk of grab a religion....... too many choice and consideration in an anc game but can hardly find any interesting strategy in a postmedieval start.so the later era start actually shortens the gap between good players and newbies. as soon as i see the noun of "occ",instantly a scene poped up in my brain:healthy ppl playing basketball in a wheelchair. yes,in an occ game,ok players become good players,newbie sbecomes ok players, occ nearly fills the gap up.u can imagine that u can even beat Michael Jordan if both of u r seting on wheelchairs playing basketball£¬right£¿ if some ppl say they like playing a more fastpaced game i strongly recommend them to play advanced start game.its very strategic though its unplayable now.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Aug 9, 2007 20:54:55 GMT -5
thats fair thing. double move is mean just like chess games,your opponent can complete see how u move,find your strategy out,but u can still beat him. for me,i dont care if there is anyone can see how i develop,expand and produce unts , like he opens wb entering tile-unveiled mod.iv been quite enjoying when i find the reality of someone knowing exactly what im doing but he can do nothing to stop me ;D if u r really good,u dont need hide your forces,assemble your troops then march forward,kill,simple.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Apr 4, 2007 22:55:49 GMT -5
good stuff!u hit the nail on the head.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on May 23, 2007 2:11:01 GMT -5
captain:xiaojuzi
member:acfox,lsm,swind007,iop098,slsl,pony,watchandlearn,ahandac
bench:aways,cahcah,hugo
cheerleader:tossgirl
rooter:qoqo,apan
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Apr 14, 2007 2:41:33 GMT -5
f**k,im the real imposter,im everybodysdar1ing, everybodysdarl1ing is surely a noob.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Apr 13, 2007 5:59:44 GMT -5
"with no hands...." the reality of the situation is i told u to choose shaka and i will go for random.i rushed u with a stack of chariots and u lost 1 city.your first impi ran around to my capital just being received 6 hwacha 's solut.u said u fell behind both in tec and power and has no hope to win so i typed gg and left.after that i reload the game and find u r still 14 turns far to get constrution when i have pumped out 10+hwachas....say nothing i have got monarchy and u didnt.how could u defeat me with no hands?!!!
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Apr 13, 2007 5:27:45 GMT -5
I'd be worried if MGT was being nice to you, he is after something ;D I used to be an elite player, then this week happened where I couldn't defeat a deformed changling with no hands. rofl.i didnt even know what exactly "changling" is until i looked it up in the dictionary finding it so offensive since i had never seen anyone use such a word to describe others.i believe u get really outraged just because i left and said:"u r not as good as i thought,no coincidence u were defeated by mrgametheory .he is much better than u",which pricked your tender spot,didnt it?lol your anger just proved my conclusion.......
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Sept 10, 2007 0:29:11 GMT -5
universe is a philosophical concept, universe is the existence of substance,existence is universe. why these smart guys exert themselves to prove the existence of existence?its nonsense. even if the metagalaxy truely originated from a bigbang,there should be other para-bigbangs,and i cant see any deal with the word "universe".
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Aug 28, 2007 23:57:46 GMT -5
and some of my friends like supremecommander,warhammer,not playing much for me.
and paraworld,i love those creative dinosaur units,though the game itself is also garbage.
i almost forget,stronghold 1,a good old game.worth playing.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Aug 28, 2007 23:39:51 GMT -5
Rise of Nation series good games,play them,u wont be disappointed.
and Age of Empire series ,ofcourse, absolute rts classic.
last,NEVER expect any game Blizzard produced would have a strategic depth.they shoud be categorized into " neural reaction skill games" and are totally strategy garbage.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Jun 7, 2007 7:53:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Aug 26, 2007 9:14:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Sept 6, 2007 4:13:09 GMT -5
low comprehension capacity£¬shame on u. the hammer/gold conversion rate can be up to 1:3 if u micromanage properly.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Aug 26, 2007 8:36:36 GMT -5
use some article written by a sp-player for referrence chop/slave for extra goldas an admin of civclub,ive guided someone to find a practical way to exploit this trick the examplehope u guys could also work this way out welcome to civclub,one of the best civforums in the world.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Jun 4, 2007 11:22:12 GMT -5
and the starvation process should be 2 steps: step1: convert part of the citizens and use up the food in the city food bar; step2: convert all citizens into scientists.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on Jun 4, 2007 8:17:21 GMT -5
i can tell those newbies something deeper....i know u have something reserved......
depending on different amount of food surplus,there is a population point at which u can start the "starvation process". starve 1-2 population,and regrow,starve,regrow. repeat this trick and u can harvest 10-20% extra beakers from the speciliasts,as well as the gp points.
but remember,starve at the right population point or u dont get any advantage.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on May 26, 2007 10:55:40 GMT -5
I suppose it depends on your land and your civ. I'd say that you'd probably need either a financial or a philo Leader. At least that's the way I've done it... but reaching liberalism first isn't a requirement to win a cton-style game. It's more effective to spam cities and artists, even more so on smaller maps. Liberalism is more of a "wow look at me" thing.... I don't know how many times I've dominated tech only to lose to the guy that kills his neighbor then spams cities in their land and bombs the hell out of his civ. yeah,its just something showoff.territory rules.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on May 26, 2007 10:50:55 GMT -5
getting an early liberalism,my record is 965bc in an occ game.......
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on May 23, 2007 0:02:09 GMT -5
noobs like building every useless wonder.
noobs choose an aggressive leader but spam cottages, build library and produce advanced units.
noobs always whine for "bad terrain" but refuse to play mirror.
noobs argue that some leaders is "too powerful or overpowered“ and should be banned but they cant win given that they choose the accused leaders while his opponents choosing a ”normal leader“
a good player never builds any wonder unless he knows a specific wonder plays a significant role in his holistic strategy.
good players never cry for unfair,they do their best under the current conditions.they play a mirror 1vs1 before claiming he is better.
good players know how to exploit leaders's traits and uu.they dont care for temporary loss or disadvantage but attain a full awareness of how to achieve the final victory.
a truth even in the game:victorious players win first and then go to war,while defeated players go to war first and then seek to win.
|
|
|
Post by xiaojuzi on May 22, 2007 3:01:27 GMT -5
I'd like to mention that newbs are persons too. They just have less gameplay hours than you. Some may just not have the will to spend countless hours on it, but some may. It's like saying to elementary school students that they suck and know nothing. With time they'll grow up to be just as intelligent and skillful as you and some maybe better. Everybody has been a kid (Or newb) before. It's just to say that your general hostility towards newbs is a bit misplaced (From this thread and others). I don't want to argue about that beyond this post, i'm just saying that without newbs the community will die. it is not true for me.... 8-)i became a good player as soon as i started my multigame career when i eliminated,yes,not just defeated other 6 players in a ffa ,my first mp game.then i defeated several players in duel games. newberdom...it is a period i missed the chance to enjoy
|
|