|
Post by Bantams on Aug 1, 2006 8:15:52 GMT -5
:)as anyone beat this guy yet seems not who his he seems great player if and when you find this post donny feel free to email cs regards joining kc thanks ;D
|
|
|
Post by deviousdevil on Aug 1, 2006 10:58:49 GMT -5
:)as anyone beat this guy yet seems not who his he seems great player if and when you find this post donny feel free to email cs regards joining kc thanks ;D Until the noob starts playing Warlords he ain't going to come across any real opposition. Despite playing some 87 games in the last week his rank is something awful and he has played 73% of games against lower ranked players than himself. Now, if he was always winning and was playing teamers, then I'd be VERY impressed.
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on Aug 1, 2006 11:20:19 GMT -5
Until the noob starts playing Warlords he ain't going to come across any real opposition. Despite playing some 87 games in the last week his rank is something awful and he has played 73% of games against lower ranked players than himself. Now, if he was always winning and was playing teamers, then I'd be VERY impressed. I had +58 from teamers only, more than half were top teamers
|
|
|
Post by GERMANIA on Aug 2, 2006 4:49:05 GMT -5
Until the noob starts playing Warlords he ain't going to come across any real opposition. Despite playing some 87 games in the last week his rank is something awful and he has played 73% of games against lower ranked players than himself. Now, if he was always winning and was playing teamers, then I'd be VERY impressed. I had +58 from teamers only, more than half were top teamers Yea your welcome for madding your streak Btw Bantams, i am starting to wonder about all of your post, should i call you sidhe junior ?
|
|
|
Post by Bantams on Aug 2, 2006 5:17:44 GMT -5
Btw Bantams, i am starting to wonder about all of your post, should i call you sidhe junior ? NO im the 2yr old kid Bantams junior in the picture i posted go see ;D
|
|
|
Post by deviousdevil on Aug 2, 2006 6:22:44 GMT -5
Until the noob starts playing Warlords he ain't going to come across any real opposition. Despite playing some 87 games in the last week his rank is something awful and he has played 73% of games against lower ranked players than himself. Now, if he was always winning and was playing teamers, then I'd be VERY impressed. I had +58 from teamers only, more than half were top teamers No you didn't, you have a 48 win streak as your longest, 2 less than me. Jeez, lying to impress Bantams...worrying.
|
|
|
Post by Lestat on Aug 2, 2006 7:17:36 GMT -5
I have longest...then you, but no streak ;D
|
|
|
Post by Bantams on Aug 2, 2006 10:15:45 GMT -5
seems this donny guy was aka silkk oh well who cares anyway
|
|
|
Post by Avogadro on Aug 2, 2006 12:54:52 GMT -5
+87 impressive no matter who it's against IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on Aug 2, 2006 14:04:51 GMT -5
I had +58 from teamers only, more than half were top teamers No you didn't, you have a 48 win streak as your longest, 2 less than me. Jeez, lying to impress Bantams...worrying. Last time i checked it was +58. Now i check it again... and it's still +58 ;D I think you need to buy a magnifying glass.
|
|
|
Post by MookieNJ on Aug 2, 2006 14:28:00 GMT -5
Now, if he was always winning and was playing teamers, then I'd be VERY impressed. Honestly, I think it takes a lot more skill to consistently win Ctons than it does to consistently win teamers. In a Cton it's you against the world. You need to defend on multiple fronts, expand, tech, etc. Plus you need to pray you've got the resources to build stronger units or you could be choked to death. On the flipside, in a teamer, a lot of the time you can get a win when you don't even contribute anything to the game. Someone else is doing all the killing while you are in the back building up, or teching, or whatever. Also, you can get a loss due to luck as well -- some noob on the front for your team loses his city to a longbow or dies to 2 Camels or whatever. In the end, I enjoy teamers a lot more than I enjoy ctons ... and I really think there is a lot of skill involved in playing a teamer well. However, unless you are playing a "bring your own team" sort of game, which is hardly ever done, there's always a large amount of luck involved with the open pick up games we play the most.
|
|
|
Post by Elledge on Aug 2, 2006 15:32:08 GMT -5
No you didn't, you have a 48 win streak as your longest, 2 less than me. Jeez, lying to impress Bantams...worrying. Last time i checked it was +58. Now i check it again... and it's still +58 ;D I think you need to buy a magnifying glass. I bet he was looking at me ;D Mookie, I think that teamers are less lucky for you as a team; whichever team summarily outplays the other will win. However, you are sometimes only 1/5 or 1/6 of your team; even if you play your top game as an individual the rest of your team can play poorly and lose the game for you and there is nothing much you can do about it. On the other hand, in a cton, although there is more luck involved, you are 100% in control of the game, and a good player can often recover from poor conditions.
|
|
|
Post by Bantams on Aug 2, 2006 16:48:46 GMT -5
Now, if he was always winning and was playing teamers, then I'd be VERY impressed. Honestly, I think it takes a lot more skill to consistently win Ctons than it does to consistently win teamers. In a Cton it's you against the world. You need to defend on multiple fronts, expand, tech, etc. Plus you need to pray you've got the resources to build stronger units or you could be choked to death. On the flipside, in a teamer, a lot of the time you can get a win when you don't even contribute anything to the game. Someone else is doing all the killing while you are in the back building up, or teching, or whatever. Also, you can get a loss due to luck as well -- some noob on the front for your team loses his city to a longbow or dies to 2 Camels or whatever. In the end, I enjoy teamers a lot more than I enjoy ctons ... and I really think there is a lot of skill involved in playing a teamer well. However, unless you are playing a "bring your own team" sort of game, which is hardly ever done, there's always a large amount of luck involved with the open pick up games we play the most. yes it does ctons are a lot harder than teamers especially the elite teamers at the moment there only elite because they play teamers is my opinion ps teamers suck take too long and cause high blood pressure due to the constent pinging in my ears
|
|
|
Post by Tony on Aug 2, 2006 19:24:01 GMT -5
Now, if he was always winning and was playing teamers, then I'd be VERY impressed. Honestly, I think it takes a lot more skill to consistently win Ctons than it does to consistently win teamers. In a Cton it's you against the world. You need to defend on multiple fronts, expand, tech, etc. Plus you need to pray you've got the resources to build stronger units or you could be choked to death. You know my record in ctons is like 80-90% win, or something crazy like that, and everyone that has played me knows im not anything special, im sure LOADS of other player are in the same baot. This is purely down to the poor standards in ctons, some good players do play them but generally speaking ctons have 0-2 good players, so if you have a nightmare of a game youll still finish 3rd. I said in another post if you play only ctons and you are marely an average player your win % should be 68-72%. In fact i could name atleast 4 very average players who have disproprtionally big win %'s for this reason, thats just off the top of my head there are probally loads of examples. If loads of good players were playing ctons then i agree with you winning them would be very tough, but the reality is 60-70% of the players will never beat you, even if you play the worst game of your life! This post is by no means blowing my own trumpet, it simply stating the fact ctons in general have VERY low standards! EDIT:: Im not saying teamer win %'s are accurate either, of course you can often win OR lose a teamer through no fault/effort of your own!
|
|
|
Post by notagoodname on Aug 2, 2006 20:08:17 GMT -5
Ctons are great in that you get ~4-10 wins in a single game, you only need to win 10 ctons in a row to have a fantastic winning streak. Although they can be hard to win if your neighbour is aggressive.
|
|
|
Post by zzZhenon on Aug 2, 2006 23:27:33 GMT -5
Now, if he was always winning and was playing teamers, then I'd be VERY impressed. Honestly, I think it takes a lot more skill to consistently win Ctons than it does to consistently win teamers. In a Cton it's you against the world. You need to defend on multiple fronts, expand, tech, etc. Plus you need to pray you've got the resources to build stronger units or you could be choked to death. On the flipside, in a teamer, a lot of the time you can get a win when you don't even contribute anything to the game. Someone else is doing all the killing while you are in the back building up, or teching, or whatever. Also, you can get a loss due to luck as well -- some noob on the front for your team loses his city to a longbow or dies to 2 Camels or whatever. In the end, I enjoy teamers a lot more than I enjoy ctons ... and I really think there is a lot of skill involved in playing a teamer well. However, unless you are playing a "bring your own team" sort of game, which is hardly ever done, there's always a large amount of luck involved with the open pick up games we play the most. Huh? ctons are extremely easy.... unless you're playing against Nero So weird, ctons are so easy they're boring and teamers are toughest for me yet the most fun. Must be the opposite for you hehe
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on Aug 3, 2006 0:32:12 GMT -5
Honestly, I think it takes a lot more skill to consistently win Ctons than it does to consistently win teamers. In a Cton it's you against the world. You need to defend on multiple fronts, expand, tech, etc. Plus you need to pray you've got the resources to build stronger units or you could be choked to death. On the flipside, in a teamer, a lot of the time you can get a win when you don't even contribute anything to the game. Someone else is doing all the killing while you are in the back building up, or teching, or whatever. Also, you can get a loss due to luck as well -- some noob on the front for your team loses his city to a longbow or dies to 2 Camels or whatever. In the end, I enjoy teamers a lot more than I enjoy ctons ... and I really think there is a lot of skill involved in playing a teamer well. However, unless you are playing a "bring your own team" sort of game, which is hardly ever done, there's always a large amount of luck involved with the open pick up games we play the most. Ctons are a joke. I had a 37/3 win/loss, +25 win streak and 19xx skill raiting from ctons when i just started playing Civ 4 (after i played like 13-15 Civ 4 games total, including singleplayer). And i got /3 losses when i started in a lakes map in a middle of a desert and near an agressive opponent. Ctons are so rediculously easy that i stopped playing them after that. And cton win streak is meaningless. Numerous players got a huge cton streaks that were stopped only by a teamer, 1v1 or a cton with some top player in a game.
|
|
|
Post by decepticon on Aug 3, 2006 5:27:49 GMT -5
All these big long posts for the answer to a simple question? who is this guy with 87+ win streak? The Answer is obviously a guy who hasn't played me yet. Bring it on girly man.
|
|
|
Post by Bantams on Aug 3, 2006 8:09:57 GMT -5
+89 now btw guess he plays less often than me some of his scalps are quite good too not all v noob as some ppl suggest 1 of them was 9 iron 1 was swissy recently as to his/her past exploits who know maybe he/shes had tommy too but he dare not say ;D
|
|
|
Post by tommynt on Aug 3, 2006 8:50:31 GMT -5
I ended every +90 streak that happened till now and f this guys get +100 i ll play him ;D
|
|