|
Post by smatt834 on Mar 22, 2007 14:24:24 GMT -5
University of Pennsylvania, March 14, 2007 Activists from the Philly 9/11 Truth organization confronted arch-Neo-Con and torture advocate Alan 'Mengele' Dershowitz at a speaking event last week, causing his fake Christian Israeli-first vulture audience to boo and throw their toys out of the pram, shortly before security were called to drag the dissenters out of the building for the crime of asking a question. What follows is a perfect example of how people who don't have the truth on their side resort to bullying and intimidation to shut down reasoned debate, as the speaker is cat-called, harangued and booed for simply pointing out that governments throughout history have engaged in false flag terror events to realize political agendas. The audience grow shrill at the temerity of having their warped orthodoxy challenged and revert to toddler tactics by engaging in screaming fits and demanding security thugs eject this thought criminal. WATCH THE YOU TUBE VIDEO HERE infowars.com/articles/sept11/dershowitz_confronted_by_911_truth_in_pa.htmWe need to form more of these "truth squads" as Webster Tarpley calls them to travel the country and stand up to the evil that resides within people like 'Mengele' Dershowitz and his fellow Neo-Fascist usurpers. A good tactic is to get together a group of about ten or fifteen individuals and sit in different parts of the lecture hall. Once the security goons start dragging out one individual, have another stand up at the opposite end of the room and let that pattern continue until the entire event is taken over by 9/11 truth.
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Mar 22, 2007 20:11:56 GMT -5
well, if 9-11 was a set up, the people that did set it up would have to be sooo smart, and all willing to keep a secret. The more complex a conspearacy is the less it is likely to be true. Think of all the people that would have to know and are all keeping quite.
|
|
|
Post by smatt834 on Mar 23, 2007 4:59:03 GMT -5
There was 200,000 people who kept the Manhattan Project secret. Pretty big complicated and secret program there. It had 3 primary sites, of one: "So secret was the site during WW2 that the state governor was unaware that Oak Ridge (what was to become the fifth largest city in the state) was being built. At one point Oak Ridge plants were consuming 1/6th of the electrical power produced in the USA, more than New York City." Here there was a little tiny town that the governor didn't know about which was consuming more power than new york city. oo that means the electric companies had to be involved not to mention highways departments and all the people working in these big facilities, those that built them, well you get the picture. It was around 200,000 people before the internet and a massively greater wealth gap forming. Didn't the aristocracy class in Europe collude with each other to maintain their wealth and power around say the time of the French Revolution? I pretty sure Hitler had some secret buddies, and he convinced the german people that the Reichstag was destroyed by Jews even though he did it. Nero in ancient Rome did the same thing. It's unfortunately more probable than you think IMHO. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project#Project_sitesand you are right great satan they are very smart.
|
|
|
Post by MMV on Mar 23, 2007 6:21:05 GMT -5
the mosts current conspiracy is that smatt has been hired by the main conspiracy theory groups to work in their public relations department.
he's been given access to a computer for one hour a day with an explicit mandate to go forth throughout cyber-land, charging down the information super-highway to post conspiracy theories so off the wall, that it makes all the other conspiracy theories seem more believable.
|
|
|
Post by smatt834 on Mar 23, 2007 15:28:07 GMT -5
maybe you missed this paragraph MMV.
"What follows is a perfect example of how people who don't have the truth on their side resort to bullying and intimidation to shut down reasoned debate, as the speaker is cat-called, harangued and booed for simply pointing out that governments throughout history have engaged in false flag terror events to realize political agendas."
good job following the script. why don't you debate the information presented instead of just name calling.
|
|
|
Post by MMV on Mar 23, 2007 18:44:33 GMT -5
maybe you missed following the script. why don't you debate the information presented instead of just name calling. didn't call you a name. NO where, not one - not even a hint. Of course, that's the difference between you conspiracy threorists and us normal people.... you see things that aren't there. I'm not a conspiracist - so there is no information to debate. UNLESS................................... you believe in THE only true conspiracy there is...... THE BIGGEST farce of this century...... Virus, pop-up ads, and malware are made, produced, and use to infect the world by..... ANTI-VIRUS companies!!! I mean come one... if there were no viri, why would anyone need anti-viri?
|
|
|
Post by MMV on Mar 23, 2007 18:47:44 GMT -5
Oh, and please don't cat-call, harangue and boo about my posts
|
|
|
Post by smatt834 on Mar 23, 2007 19:35:55 GMT -5
you imply that sourced information I post is .... "off the wall conspiracy theory" and then go on to post rambling gibberish without ever actually adressing anything important. you also seem to imply that I have some sort of minority or fringe viewpoint that only a few people subscribe to. But according to "..A monumental new scientific opinion poll [which] has emerged declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks." www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/13469From Zogby polls to CNN polls to Canadian Radio polls, the MAJORITY believe there was some sort of coverup. Links to all the polls i mentioned can be found at this hub. www.prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/141006poll.htmHERE IS A LINK TO ZOGBY. Zogby polls are used and considered accurate by every university on the planet. Half of New Yorkers Believe US Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9-11 Attacks and “Consciously Failed” To Act; 66% Call For New Probe of Unanswered Questions by Congress or New York’s Attorney General, New Zogby International Poll Reveals www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855I'm sorry you don't agree with my views so why don't you try to refute them instead of just saying they are off the wall.
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Mar 23, 2007 20:39:40 GMT -5
the manhattan project got leaked to russia by liberals. The same libs who sabotaged america's nuke power industry.
|
|
|
Post by zzZhenon on Mar 23, 2007 22:02:38 GMT -5
lol yes it's all those dastardly liberals
hey wasn't slavery abolishment considered "liberal?"
|
|
|
Post by MMV on Mar 23, 2007 22:44:13 GMT -5
I imply nothing. Why, just last night at the Ladder Member "Get smatt834" meeting we were all talking about your beliefs and how our Elite Special Paranoia groups will work on you. After the meeting, we all got drunk and went to stare at your house. (a good time was had by all)
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Mar 24, 2007 13:00:47 GMT -5
Abortion is liberal, uthinasia is liberal, communism(slavery) is liberal. I think Abe was a christain conservitive. He believed all people where gods childern or something like that. Good thing to because if he was a sissy liberal the north woulda lost and America would look like nazi europe(liberal utopia). Nothing appeals more to a liberal then the ability to tell others what is legal to say, do, eat, raise kids, learn, watch, teach, drive, etc. Conservitives like Abe are all about freedom, liberty, and responeablity (however spelling is not that important to us ) . Slavery was brought down by a concervitive. I really hope some lib trys to take my gun away
|
|
|
Post by DrShot on Mar 25, 2007 3:40:51 GMT -5
"US Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9-11 Attacks " Well, thats a no brainer. But Where/when how and so on made it a little difficult to stop(still does). How about Pearl Harbour... How about Flight 93(thinking thats the one, 'crashed' in the field). Likely shot down to prevent it from going into a city/metro area and killing many many more people(tough call, but correct IMO). No Black box recovered best I know(no silly, goofy named websites for links, sorry). Polls, well they are HISTORICALLY , no Notoriously known to be easly tools for deception and misrepresentation. Now, does that mean that all polls are so? I doubt it. But to say that "Zogby polls are used and considered accurate by every university on the planet." is simply stupid, plain and simple. Is this bias showing or are you ill, I know you are smarter than to believe such a statement, no? Ok, My turn to put up magic links that will promote what(ever) I say (I have a link, therefor it must be true, muahahaha). www.uncorrelated.com/2006/03/zogby_poll_propaganda.html try a google on 'zogby lacking credibility' you will find a bushle of links and sites saying zogby is not God. CNN and Canadian Radio, well, I best just STFU now, those are true unbiased authorities on truth and justice. Most important, lets remember what polls actually are: OPINIONS So, because 5000 schmucks say it is so makes it thus? Hardly. Or if that is the case I will get 6000 schmucks to convey my side as truth. Well, enof bant0r for now, I want to be like Satan and not use a spel sheker!! MMV you bust me up, every time.
|
|
|
Post by dagiants on Mar 25, 2007 6:31:28 GMT -5
There was 200,000 people who kept the Manhattan Project secret. Pretty big complicated and secret program there. It had 3 primary sites, of one: And yet the Soviets still found out about it. It must have been their secret ESP program that Bush's Dad found out about and is currently uses it to talk to aliens. You are thinking irrationally and are basing your opinions on the lack of evidence. In your empty brain small scraps off proof, most of which are unrelated, add up to truth. "Bush must have been behind 9/11 because they were able to keep the manhatten project secret." Can you not see how rediculous that sounds? What makes you think that a halfwit such as your self can discover the truth and yet people with multiple degrees, extremely high IQs, and those that actually worked close to the president miss it? Hell we are seeing generals come out hollering against the president about the mishandling of the Iraq war and your telling me not one person out of the hundreds or thousands that had to be involved has come foward?
|
|
|
Post by MMV on Mar 25, 2007 18:30:53 GMT -5
Awe shux Doc - thanks.
(and thinks for buying a round of drinks at last nights "Get smatt834[/i]" meeting)
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Mar 26, 2007 22:53:41 GMT -5
I missed the last "get smatt" meeting However I wouldnt be suprized if smatt was some kinda government agent. He seems to smart to just be a crazy consperacey guy. I bet he's trying to make us all believe the American government is responcable for 9/11. Seems like he spends a lot of time researching this. It could all be a ploy to get the American people to blaim there government for the next terrorist attack instead of the terrorist. This makes a new terror attack 2.35 times more powerful and gives aquida a +2 to chrisma. Soooo smatt834, as if thats ur real name, who do u really work for!!
|
|
|
Post by smatt834 on Apr 1, 2007 6:16:46 GMT -5
keeping something secret isn't that hard. we live in a pyramidal society much like the egyptians did. THRU COMPARTMENTALIZATION a desired outcome can be achieved without the lower level dupes even knowing the real purpose. They will just follow the orders they are given from the rung above them. The military is a good example of a compartmentalized group. Compartmentalization has its benefits in that each small group is focused on one thing and therefore less likely to foul it up. This is how beauocracy works too, with specialists and executives. Fire doesn't melt steel.
|
|
|
Post by MMV on Apr 1, 2007 9:28:21 GMT -5
actually, it does - education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01.htmland that's why the effected floors "fell" to the floors below them with a weight and impact that would cause those floors to fall in succession. 911review.com/coverup/fantasy/melting.htmlwhich of course doesn't take into consideration the results of MILLIONS of gallons of water from the fire-extinguishers draining down to the lower floors making them weaker (at an approximate weight of 8.345lbs per gallon) But of course, that's taking into consideration the engineering of buildings like that. each steel-beam/concrete slab, reinforces the other with the total number of beams/concrete slabs forming the whole - making it an engineering marvel. Remove one single beam/slab and the building structure becomes unsafe and ineffective ever look UP at one and see the entire building sway from the wind? the "get smatt834" group did a google study on you the results? validity of smatt834: "Your search - validity of smatt834 - did not match any documents. Suggestions: Make sure all words are spelled correctly. Try different keywords. Try more general keywords. Try fewer keywords." ah the fun of the internet - it's there for everyone. Also - the "Get Smatt834" group put forward a motion to ensure that all your bills come due at the same week next month - it was never seconded because we were all in a hurry to get out and go to a strip-club a good time was had by all.
|
|
|
Post by smatt834 on Apr 1, 2007 15:23:45 GMT -5
ok MMV you asked for it. Fire does not melt steel. Why don't you go ask a stuctural engineer and see what he says. Or better yet why don't you post a website that has sourced information like this one. www.wpi.edu/News/Transformations/2002Spring/steel.htmlmelting steel with fire requires a smelter or some sort of blast furnace. an ordinary office fire is not going to be this hot unless you live in fantasy world. but why not just listen to the owner of WTC 7 say they blew up the building? youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk
|
|
|
Post by MMV on Apr 1, 2007 18:15:19 GMT -5
nah, you don't click on my links - I don't click on yours.
oh, and PLEASE don't argue with me here, I'm only doing my job.
if you'd check the minutes from the last "Get Smatt834" meeting, you'd see that "they" are forcing me to post in response to you.
oh wait, you're not allowed to see the minutes because it's special compartmented information (SCI).
see you next week when we come out to check your cable tv!
|
|