Post by MMV on Aug 22, 2006 8:12:05 GMT -5
Speaking of what you noted as "bull govno" -
Youth and "filtered history" make you blind
The response below this to ajerzguy's post aren't from blindness, but show an ignorance of geopolitics, geography, history, and reading comprehension skills:
(ajerzguy posted about vietnam and your post answered about korea - not the same places nor times in history)
Aug 10, 2006, 9:14am, ajerzguy wrote:
For your information, North Vietnam was a province of France and with both Russian and Chinese involvement supported Ho Chi Minh with arms and training to start the revolution. After years of war the French bailed out and the US sent advisors to South Vietnam. This was legal due to the following; In 1954 it was determined by the Geneva Conference that the State of Vietnam would rule the territory of Vietnam south of the 17th parallel, of which the former colony of Cochin-China formed the heartland, pending unification on the basis of supervised elections (see Geneva Conference (1954)) in 1956. The elections and unification did not take place as planned (see below). When the territory was divided in this way, approximately 800,000 to 1 million North Vietnamese, mainly Vietnamese Roman Catholics, fled south due to what they perceived as "communist persecution" in the North. The Republic of Vietnam was proclaimed in Sàigòn by Ngô Ðình Diệm on October 22, 1955, after the Emperor Bảo Ðại was deposed.
your response:
Somehow, wikipedia doesn't agree to you once again. There was a civil war and USA invaded independent country.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korea#Division_and_War
(Quote the correct link to the correct countries in the correct time period please).
The current political and cultural difference in what is now russia and what WAS the government of the USSR (which included the russians) is not an arguement. That's like saying
President Bush is a Texan and shouldn't be blamed for all this - Blame Texas, ok? Thanks in response to your statetement - "Stalin is georgian, he isn't russian. Blame georgia ok? Thanks[/i].
You reference the url's of BLOGS and not international independent news or historical info link; consquently you are using a BLOG of someone else's oppion to rationalize your own oppinion instead of using historical fact. An oppinion based on an oppinion means nothing - use facts.
and once again - the citizens of the former USSR (including the russian culture) were EXTREMELY limited to news of the world as it was filtered and censored through USSR government radion/television/news. You didn't respond to "afghanistan" - and that's ok, you aren't old enough to remember.
Same with Cuba and MANY MANY other events of the post WWII "cold war years" - some of us ARE old enough to remember the facts without having to reference a blog of someone else's oppinion vice an independent recognized world news source.
Your "rhetoric" is a reflection of who you are, not who you are trying to be.
WHOLE lot of govno in your posts.
(but please continue your filtered non-historical data, it's REALLY funny!)
Thanks!