|
Post by plattfuss on Nov 4, 2007 9:31:01 GMT -5
Well, now that the game has been resumed lets play it. I have started to make another investment of time and wouldnt like that to be in vane.
|
|
|
Post by plattfuss on Nov 10, 2007 2:57:20 GMT -5
@ classical hero: you obviously didnt receive my pm. I was wondering how we can avoid a double move situation when war is allowed. My suggestion is that we keep the playing sequence from this turn (1836 AD) on. I havent played the turn yet, so you can pick if you like to be first or second in the playing sequence each turn. However, I will have to make my moves until 3 CET (thats 6 hours from now). So if you havent played until then, that will give you the second slot in the turn. ok?
|
|
|
Post by plattfuss on Nov 10, 2007 12:32:40 GMT -5
Waited til just now. So I 'll be moving first ...
|
|
|
Post by plattfuss on Nov 11, 2007 5:06:29 GMT -5
hm, no reply. Instead you double moved.
I now double move as well ...
|
|
|
Post by classicalhero on Nov 12, 2007 8:01:50 GMT -5
Not being able to see the civstats is a huge disadvantage to me, since I cannot properly check the game, plus we will have to bring the game down, since I am not feeling that well right now. I did not DM you during war, so what is your problem? Only during war is it prohibited, not that I would have been able to do any damage to you anyway. I think the easiest thing to do is to call you the winner since you have a massive troop and commerce advantage that no one would have been able to defeat, even if everyone was stil alive and had a decent army. So I think it is best just to call you the winner.
Also every time I have played my turn I make sure that I get out of the game after beingg the last one to play. Before the 1840 deadline there have been numerous changes in the play order and it is only until war that DMs come into play.
|
|
|
Post by plattfuss on Nov 12, 2007 14:02:24 GMT -5
Alright then, accepted. Good game, everybody.
Thanks for subbing, classicalhero, and thanks to Whip, for keeping this game up all the time, including the hassle that is connected to that.
|
|
|
Post by whiplash on Nov 12, 2007 19:19:38 GMT -5
Well, it's been 13 months! GG I'll take the game down and declare Platt the winner in Civstats.
|
|
|
Post by classicalhero on Nov 13, 2007 6:48:35 GMT -5
Are you going to start another game?
|
|
|
Post by whiplash on Nov 13, 2007 17:34:15 GMT -5
I was thinking about running a 2-team One City Challenge WarLords game.
I'm not sure I could generate enough interest among ladder players.
|
|
|
Post by emperor on Nov 28, 2007 2:29:26 GMT -5
Well done, plattfuss. Hope to see you in another game.
|
|