|
Post by zzZhenon on Sept 23, 2007 8:38:43 GMT -5
wasn't it 3 city elim when regicide was on in civ3?
|
|
moineau
Warrior
Administrator
Posts: 330
|
Post by moineau on Sept 23, 2007 9:01:55 GMT -5
No.
|
|
|
Post by charliebrownparker on Sept 23, 2007 9:07:26 GMT -5
wasn't it 3 city elim when regicide was on in civ3? It could be on good idea Zhenon. We had some test on that mode zhenon. It has always been the same thing. Guy who hadn't oil on his start zone will loose. Without oil you can't do mechs but only antitanks and infantries!!!! It's very hard to defend against Modern Armors and Choppers. Settler cost is so expansive that imo it will only be rush/pillage games.
|
|
|
Post by cryptococcus on Sept 23, 2007 10:08:23 GMT -5
Great news CCC died Now it is a solo tournament + sunday mad hours regicide futur and a stupid FF I appreciate the organization and time spent on making ccc possible, but I've now lost all interest. Just because most of the forum spammers only play occ, because they are horrible at teamers (clans) or cton's, doesn't mean that they should set the ccc. Can't believe ccc is ruined. ie. no classical. Btw, I got to holocanthe post and stopped reading. I really don't care what the reasoning was for ruining ccc.
|
|
|
Post by cryptococcus on Sept 23, 2007 10:26:56 GMT -5
Well the worst would be to see him in your bed.... Rofl, with ninou or with charlie?
|
|
|
Post by cryptococcus on Sept 23, 2007 10:28:30 GMT -5
I have an idea, how about we make an event. OCC noobs 2v1 against best representative in a clan in a teamer? That sounds like good event to me.
|
|
|
Post by cryptococcus on Sept 23, 2007 10:30:48 GMT -5
Btw, mods are not f**king place for ccc, have the slows in ladder can't even load a mod. Nor is ccc the place for god damn experiments. WTF goes through your people's minds?
|
|
ot4e
Settler
Posts: 98
|
Post by ot4e on Sept 23, 2007 11:14:36 GMT -5
Btw, mods are not f**king place for ccc, have the slows in ladder can't even load a mod. Nor is ccc the place for god damn experiments. WTF goes through your people's minds? +1
|
|
ot4e
Settler
Posts: 98
|
Post by ot4e on Sept 23, 2007 11:24:12 GMT -5
To OT4E : CCCAC removes classical cause we cannot match our oppinions on a new map for it. Balanced wasn't good for classical. Too easy to spot your cap on copper or horses. If you have an idea please let us know. FFS! Remove modern event too, it is too easy to plant on the oil or coal. What else? Remove rene it is easy to plant on horses and iron, remove everything except ancient where you feel safety planted around nothing. Seriously remove stupied mods nobody except CS plays. Or make them out of overall scoring. I like ccc as civ4 championship without specials. It is more than enouph hard to practice all eras, no need make it more difficult. Balanced was okay with classical as any other. Make it on TBG if you dont like. why remove?
|
|
[KC]Bopper
Worker
The Knight Who Says 'Giddy-Up!'
Posts: 136
|
Post by [KC]Bopper on Sept 23, 2007 12:43:32 GMT -5
Newsflash! CIV BTS has been released featuring new maps, new scenarios and... omg.... new ways to play!
How did IS Teamers become popular? umm... cuz someone started to play them and they became tourney settings at some point.
I guess I must be pretty naive (or add whatever other descriptive phrases you like) to think that some new game styles might be enjoyable. Inside each clan I'm sure that there are players with different skill sets that might enjoy becoming a specialist in other types of game settings.
Singles 1v1, Reny 3v3, Future Regicide 3v3, Ironman, CTON, Indu 3v3, Anc 4v4, UQC OCC, Reny (slow) OCC, Modern 3v3. Is it so painful?
Finals: Medi 3v3, Random 2v2, Final Frontier CTON (omg, i have to learn new words for the same techs), Killer CTON
I'm sorry folks, I think these games look pretty cool, I haven't even played a UQC OCC in a while as I've been giving many of these game settings a spin.
What's that old tv commercial.... 'Try it! You'll like it!'
|
|
|
Post by Lestat on Sept 23, 2007 12:58:05 GMT -5
I have an idea, how about we make an event. OCC noobs 2v1 against best representative in a clan in a teamer? That sounds like good event to me. U suck on OCC, my love, u kno it ... then u cant call any 1 noob
|
|
axius
Warrior
CCCAC Representative
Posts: 220
|
Post by axius on Sept 23, 2007 14:11:31 GMT -5
1. Can we get a reply about CTON with "civ choice: yes"? Is this a typo? If not then what possible justification is between that change?
2. How does a clan get a representative in this CCCAC thing?
CBP complains about a lack of activity there - but that forum is restricted. And it sounds very much like the few people who are active there are abusing their powers to custom-tailor CCC for their clans. MDR and LKT got owned in Classic --> CBP and Moineau are in CCCAC --> bye bye Classic. KC can't score points in any standard event --> CS is the head honcho --> mods get added to the CCC that are played by KC members and almost nobody else. Anybody else sees something fishy here?
Shouldn't all clans be represented in CCCAC?
|
|
|
Post by venceslas on Sept 23, 2007 14:25:49 GMT -5
Axius, that is your choice not to be in CCCAC forum, you just need to send a mail to CS. Several posts has suggested to all clan to subscibe, but you don't read it, or ignored, so don't complain about that. It really been often repeated .
LKT has made final of the last classic, is it a so bad result? LKT has been owned so many time in so many events that your post is a nonsense. Don't you think that your point is rather linked at the fact that RUS has won the classic?
Go on CCCAC forum, write your opinion, but please don't assume worst thing at first glance, your post seems kindla childish.
chris.
|
|
axius
Warrior
CCCAC Representative
Posts: 220
|
Post by axius on Sept 23, 2007 14:32:46 GMT -5
You are right - we must have missed the opportunity to join CCCAC. Our clan leader and myself will contact CS. However, I still think some lobbying is taking place - some changes are way too sudden and surprisingly convenient for some of clans.
And still waiting to hear the explanation for choosing civs in CTON...
|
|
|
Post by venceslas on Sept 23, 2007 14:37:34 GMT -5
Well at least I can agree with you on this point, sure we are more defensive with events where we have good result. But like you I think we prefer playable and fun events and we are going to struggle for that.
Let's me give you an example, I have won 1v1, so I will be happy to play with same setting, however that is also true that resource make this event a bit random, so I cannot disagree too much with this decision, I understand it(even though game lose in fun in my view). Classic event is a bit the same, make a city on horse or copper for Zulu and game is almost won. For LKT I would have prefered keeping the same setting.
chris.
|
|
ot4e
Settler
Posts: 98
|
Post by ot4e on Sept 23, 2007 14:56:20 GMT -5
LKT has made final of the last classic, is it a so bad result? LKT has been owned so many time in so many events that your post is a nonsense. Don't you think that your point is rather linked at the fact that RUS has won the classic? Go on CCCAC forum, write your opinion, but please don't assume worst thing at first glance, your post seems kindla childish. chris. Whats wrong with being dissapointed with removing the even you win. I dont express all emotions here, but there is nothing special that RUS has won that event. Or is it enouph to ban this event just for that? I know why did they decide to remove it. That's because we played against LKT in classical and they acted like newbies. I played about 10 games in classical in ccc, and 7 times my opponents blamed resourses and map and considered it as the only reason of their lose. I will go to CCCAP forum as soon as possible to prevent ccc from going completely out of mind. Let's me give you an example, I have won 1v1, so I will be happy to play with same setting, however that is also true that resource make this event a bit random, so I cannot disagree too much with this decision, I understand it(even though game lose in fun in my view). chris. I lost 1x1 to you but I dont feel sorry for that and dont think that it is enouph to change rules or remove this event. OT4E
|
|
moineau
Warrior
Administrator
Posts: 330
|
Post by moineau on Sept 23, 2007 15:18:09 GMT -5
We removed Classical because yes this event is for most part based on your start (if you can plant on horse or Cupper/iron when you are zoulou).
And that is the only event in this case (plant on oil in modern isnt so powerful because you can make anti-tank)
One reason why we removed classical too is that we had too many event and classical is basically the same than ancient, then we removed it.
Thank you do dont accuse anyone to want to change an event because he didnt win it.
|
|
ot4e
Settler
Posts: 98
|
Post by ot4e on Sept 23, 2007 16:02:15 GMT -5
We removed Classical because yes this event is for most part based on your start (if you can plant on horse or Cupper/iron when you are zoulou). And that is the only event in this case (plant on oil in modern isnt so powerful because you can make anti-tank) You can make anti-impi too if you plant near metal. Wait I dont remember how is it called, but that unit has 50% against melee and power of 5. Thnx. It is obvious that you want to remove event you completely suck. I want to remove future, pls you are welcome.
|
|
moineau
Warrior
Administrator
Posts: 330
|
Post by moineau on Sept 23, 2007 16:04:47 GMT -5
Hey man i dont remember what is needed to make an axeman, hm, ah yes cupper or iron.
And if you dont have?
Hm i dont remember what is needed to make an anti-tank, hm...
|
|
ot4e
Settler
Posts: 98
|
Post by ot4e on Sept 23, 2007 16:11:45 GMT -5
Hey man i dont remember what is needed to make an axeman, hm, ah yes cupper or iron. And if you dont have? Hm i dont remember what is needed to make an anti-tank, hm... hmmm what do you need to build impi? hmmm hmmm archers are good pick babylon if you are not sure in yourself
|
|