Im guessing here but i dont think CS or SPM would agree with you on this, but i guess we gonna have to ask them!
I can't speak for SPM or CS, only myself. And that is my opinion. Thanks for following me around the board though Tony. I appreciate you questioning everything I write, and really miss you on the ladder.
Tommy, again, has stepped outa the shadows an put it quite clearly for everyone to understand.
As mentioned in Civ3 boards what seems like a hundred+ years ago...
Cases is a fine system. Cases is set up for 1v1 play, checkers as an example and like style games.
Cases was a fine and user friendly format to start a civ3( now civ4) gaming ladder, great idea, thanks for the effort!
My understanding of challenges was (as most players in top notches play each other at least sometimes) any suitable game or game played after challenge would count. As pointed out, the 1v1 is the default or failsafe to keep the process running.
wow, I reset my 'stats' today, took me one small game to get into the top 100 and in the top 50 after the second... come on, get over the numbers and civ it up!