|
Post by thegreatsatan on Jun 25, 2007 14:07:28 GMT -5
Russia has been blaming America for thier problems since America has been around to blame.
It's an interesting statement. I would like to know who exactly blamed USA and for which exact problems?
Well, this week its America's aggresive forien policy, building missle defences. And thats why life sucks in russia right now cause of the capitolist pig dogs are on the march and we all gotta sacrifice to beat them.
Lets see, USA broke your wall, flopped afganistan, and sold you levi's for 100s of dollers a pair. I can't think of a car brand out of russia (cause russian cars suck ass). You people over there need to learn to govern yourself in some way that don't always lead to a war mongering dictator. The russian country slogan has become "You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours." Its like the good ol boys club gone commie super power.
|
|
|
Post by whiplash on Jun 25, 2007 16:35:20 GMT -5
I have little knowledge of Russia; but I have heard that Russia is run by the Russian Mafia and Putin is the Godfather who keeps them all in line.
I think the Russian national auto is the Lada. ;D
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Jun 26, 2007 16:27:22 GMT -5
What the hell is a Lada? Slave labor just can't compete with modern factories. And the employment of slave labor slows down the development of new manunfacturing technoligys. Also, slaves get better at there jobs slower cause they dont wanna be there, or sometimes they die or escape. The more complex the product, the more slavery effects quallity. Which is why commies can't make cars. And if you think a russian car is horrable, you should sign up as a cosmonaught.
|
|
|
Post by whiplash on Jun 27, 2007 14:23:54 GMT -5
Lada is the trademark of AutoVAZ, a Russian car manufacturer located in the city of Toliatti.
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Jun 27, 2007 16:24:34 GMT -5
ur the man whip ;D looks like a kia. They probly stole the design. did you see anything about how good they are or is it illegal to say anything bad about the cars there
|
|
|
Post by whiplash on Jun 27, 2007 21:05:08 GMT -5
Not a Kia; Ladas have been copies of the Fiats for decades.
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on Jun 28, 2007 7:38:23 GMT -5
ur the man whip ;D looks like a kia. They probly stole the design. did you see anything about how good they are or is it illegal to say anything bad about the cars there Nah, that's actually a good-looking one, relatively of course. If you want something bad-looking, check this one - 2109 codenamed "smoothing-iron" for it's form. And yes, they suck and everyone says that. That's why there is a six-month queue to buy a locally-assembled Ford, for example.
|
|
|
Post by whiplash on Jun 28, 2007 8:42:30 GMT -5
I spent a week driving through the Former Yugoslavia when it was still a communist country. Every car on the road was a Lada. It was the only car available. It looked pretty much like the one in El's pic. I was driving a German Opal and it actually drew crowds of people looking it over. They were very impressed.
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Jun 28, 2007 13:55:19 GMT -5
Socialist governments like russia tell the many that they are helping them by banning imports. But these type of policys only greese the palms of the people makin the Lada's and the government officials that ban there compition. America allows its people to choose what car is best (till liberals gain power). The people naturally buy the car that is best and thus get the best productivity out of it. Americans aren't stuck driving what some buracrat thinks is best (least not till liberals come to power) They choose the car that best fits there individual needs. Its like the one size fits all vs a custom fit. And thats why socialism sucks. If russia wanted to get more fords quicker, I'm sure america, japan and other are more then willing to ship u guys some, already built and ready to roll off the boat. But that wouldnt help Lada or the commies protecting them. It would only help the little pee-on that would give his left nut for a little toyota truck. (toyotas are worth it too trust me )
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on Jun 29, 2007 1:34:56 GMT -5
Socialist governments like russia tell the many that they are helping them by banning imports. But these type of policys only greese the palms of the people makin the Lada's and the government officials that ban there compition. America allows its people to choose what car is best (till liberals gain power). The people naturally buy the car that is best and thus get the best productivity out of it. Americans aren't stuck driving what some buracrat thinks is best (least not till liberals come to power) They choose the car that best fits there individual needs. Its like the one size fits all vs a custom fit. And thats why socialism sucks. If russia wanted to get more fords quicker, I'm sure america, japan and other are more then willing to ship u guys some, already built and ready to roll off the boat. But that wouldnt help Lada or the commies protecting them. It would only help the little pee-on that would give his left nut for a little toyota truck. (toyotas are worth it too trust me ) I'm really interested, how old are you? You sound like a stupid kid judging from your posts in that topic. No government wants a free imports because it's bad for a country's economy. Read some articles or whatever before writing something as retar ded once again in that topic. Tell me why the hell recently USA started to whine about cheap China imports? By your logic, USA commy government is to be blamed for that ;D Besides, Russia wants to join WTO. Other countries don't want Russia there. So, in your accusations you chosen a wrong target as well. I can give you a friendly advice - if you want to troll on a forums, especially about a political matters, check your facts so not to look like a fool. And finally, everyone is free to ship whatever he wants in Russa, but customs fees are relatively high for cars. That forces car manufacturers to open assembly lines in Russia itself. Obviously, it's a good thing for a Russian economy. Besides, that's exactly what other countries with a free economy are doing, but their customs fees are limited by WTO. P.S. You're right, Japan cars are better than USA cars. I heard Toyota will open their assembly line in Russia as well. However, i want Nissan Skyline GT-R aka "Godzilla" ;D 4WD sportcar, 450 horsepower with a non-hardware tuning and electronics is ages beyond Ford one ;D Oh well, it will take several years to save money for that one and it's not that easy to get one in Russia, AFAIK Nissan doesn't ship that model to other countries.
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Jun 29, 2007 8:42:25 GMT -5
Imports are good for economies. Cheap imports from china have raised the USA standerd of living a ton. The only people that hate trade are the poeple who have to compete with it. Judging by walmarts success, I'de guess the American people love trade.
Trade frees up the American work force for more modern jobs. A deep fryer that woulda costed $100 bucks in the 80s is only 20 bucks today. Also america's unemployment rate is at 5% which basicly full employment. Russia's is around 10% according to "official data" so its realisticly at 15%. But hey, if you need a job in Russia, i bet the ford assembly plant is hiring to meet there massive demand. What russia does is charge terriffs on imports. Russia aint the only one that does this. Japan does it too. Its hard to get a ford there without paying an extra 5 grand in fees. The logic is to help toyota and friends sell more cars in japan. But by limiting the compition, the over all quallity of the product suffers. See the new Tundra's get recalled for crappy transmissions. That Happened to ford when they ruled the car scene in america hands down. The companys take advantage of the terrifs and RnD suffers cause it aint as hard to compete.
Trade is good. I cant see why people dont want russia in the WTO. Maybe there are people who dont wanna compete with russia. They see those Lada dealerships appearing in there town and totally fear competeing with them.
|
|
nicoya1
Warrior
Tourney Director
C4PTD
Posts: 253
|
Post by nicoya1 on Jun 29, 2007 23:15:56 GMT -5
realistically America unemployment rate is not 5%. 5 % is the amount of ppl receiving unemployment checks. which means ppl who are out of work for more than a year are no longer eligible of unemployment.
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Jun 30, 2007 19:58:46 GMT -5
accually the capitolist pig dogs report there unemployment to be its lowest in history, around 4%. I'm sure this is just propaganda because it paints the USA in a positive way.
Leme try this aproach. Commie-ism has some advantages. For exsample, a commie dictator has total control of the direction of research and developement. By being able to dump loads of cash into any project he (no she) wants allows commies to surge ahead in technology in that field. The modern subs and satalites are the result of this. Scientist that work because thier familys will die otherwise can do well in short burst, but in the long term they can't compete with a life long dedicated scientist. In the end, commies dump loads of money into there research programs, many testers die, and all they end up to show for it all is a few moon rocks.
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Oct 13, 2007 11:59:36 GMT -5
Putin continues to take on more power. He is still whinning about the missle defences in Europe. He is busting out all the old military stuff and running drills. He conitues to threatin action unless America pulls the missle shield out.
I hope America pulls out of europe. Euros aren't worth protecting. A communist dictatorship is exsactly what europe needs. Putin needs to act soon if he is gunna act. Americans will have no prob turning a blind eye to the Russians killing people that hate them. But If you wait to long Putin, Americans are very emotional and the tide can turn. My advice is that u attack and blame global warming. Say you are trying to save the earth. In the current political climite, you'll even get American support. GL Putin. I hope you whoop them euros up.
|
|
marr
Worker
Posts: 169
|
Post by marr on Oct 14, 2007 2:38:29 GMT -5
Lmao at America still try to sell its Missile Defence Program! Tried it with Canada, failed. We were even offered free participation into this illustrious 7 billion dollars a year program. Lucky for us Cretian didn't want a space war and Paul Martin honored that.
Question: Has the MDP even shot down a rocket yet? Last I heard it got one in ten or something close to that.
Question: Why is America selling this tech to europe when its mission statement was the defence of NA against terrorist missle attacks.
Question: 'Clash of Civilizations' What does this statement really mean?
Question: Why is America promoting this tech in europe when it knows Russia isn't a part of the European Energy Charter?
Question: Why shouldn't Russia sell a nuclear reactor to Iran when America wants to sell a MDP to Russias neighbors?
And last but not least; ROFL @ Rice and her delegates being taken aback at the public rhetoric from Putin! WTF did you expect when your trying to disrupt and potentially equalize another countrys trade network?!
|
|
|
Post by thegreatsatan on Oct 17, 2007 18:41:05 GMT -5
Lmao at America still try to sell its Missile Defence Program! Tried it with Canada, failed. We were even offered free participation into this illustrious 7 billion dollars a year program. Lucky for us Cretian didn't want a space war and Paul Martin honored that. And last but not least; ROFL @ Rice and her delegates being taken aback at the public rhetoric from Putin! WTF did you expect when your trying to disrupt and potentially equalize another countrys trade network?! Question: Has the MDP even shot down a rocket yet? Last I heard it got one in ten or something close to that. Question: Why is America selling this tech to europe when its mission statement was the defence of NA against terrorist missle attacks. Question: 'Clash of Civilizations' What does this statement really mean? Question: Why is America promoting this tech in europe when it knows Russia isn't a part of the European Energy Charter? Question: Why shouldn't Russia sell a nuclear reactor to Iran when America wants to sell a MDP to Russias neighbors? If America was sellin the missle shields, i'de be totally cool with it. Its just that in America, the politicians have a habbit of giving away the farm. I can't see the logic in giving stuff to people that hate you. I realize there are some eastern euro's that like America and we americans would love to help you. But in reality, I think you guys are screwed. If you live there and have a pro-west past, I'de get the hell out. Question: Why is America selling this tech to europe when its mission statement was the defence of NA against terrorist missle attacks. (LOL Thats the most sissy thing I've ever heard. So what you're sayin is " hey, hey, hey... when you guys spent your money making that missle thing. You SAID it was only for the defence of NA, and only against terrorist missles. Its not fair that you use in in europe against commies" cry me a river.) Question: 'Clash of Civilizations' What does this statement really mean? (CLASH= that means a fight. OF = well... ask Levi CIVILIZATIONS= more then 1 civilization. When you put them all the gether CLASH+OF+CIVILIZATIONS, I think it means civilizations fighting eachother.) Question: Why is America promoting this tech in europe when it knows Russia isn't a part of the European Energy Charter? (LOL whaaaa ) Question: Why shouldn't Russia sell a nuclear reactor to Iran when America wants to sell a MDP to Russias neighbors? (Because if a nuke goes off in America that gets traced back to Russia, we'll $ Russia up. And anyone else involved.)
|
|