|
Post by GERMANIA on May 30, 2006 16:54:33 GMT -5
Well well lestat, its funny really, you never been any time in one of our teamer as fact, you don't know how we play how good we are and how it sucks if a game witch took us 25 mins to get in on ends after just 45 mins ore less, non of us are willing to invest so much time for nothing!
Well just for you we aren't against newbs, there been enough who joined us started to play with us, listen to us and went to vets! (polydeukes, everybodysdarling, rockk,ironclad...and much more best is phoenix even if he is now inactive, he been a newb but learned so fast like non be for and been after only 3 weeks one of the best players. So if you are willing to learn you will be always welcome in my games, like a new player called jayjay085, he isn't good but he likes to do 1vs1 and want then to listen what he did wrong and how he can get better! We need more players like that, and not players like you Lestat who believes after 8 month that he is a vet because he has more then 1000 reports! We aren't looking for quantities players, what you are for sure, we are looking for qualities players!
PS: please don't answer any of my post more ore talk any kind of unimportant statements, non are interested what you are talking
|
|
|
Post by Lestat on May 30, 2006 17:44:00 GMT -5
sory cant rofl vets with negative win% PS ya ya skills If top10 playing always each other and they share 50% win their rank and skill will be high especialy if exists realy 2-3 expert players in top 10 with high skill.
|
|
|
Post by deyreepher on May 30, 2006 23:09:36 GMT -5
Hey....I love my 2 -30+ game losing streaks......sometimes you're hot....alot of times you may be not.
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on May 31, 2006 2:42:25 GMT -5
I know that this sucks and believe me i really don't like to do that, but ... U ARE BORED WITH YOUR TEAMER. PLAY WITH WHO U WANT AND STOP POSTING CRAP HERE ABOUT IM EXPERT AND OTHERS SUCK. sory cant rofl vets with negative win% Teamers don't really improve your win/loss %. With ctons only, i had a 37/3 win/loss ratio. It took me a very loooong time to improve that highest achieved win streak and skill ratio with teamers only. And win% will never be that good. Show us your own ub3r l33t sk1llz then.
|
|
|
Post by Bantams on May 31, 2006 4:16:34 GMT -5
;D now thats funny Ellestar
|
|
|
Post by tamijo on May 31, 2006 5:26:37 GMT -5
I can understand that y top skill players are unsecure about playing teamer with new (or more correctly low skill) players.
But seen from the other side. Very few CTON/FFA games with skilled players that are REN, so us low skill players miss the chance to get to know the REN, and we miss the guidence of y pros that would make it possible for us to learn. As y all know REN is a hard game to get used to, and its hard to play well and take advise at the same time, even if y try your best, y will miss something. Or y focus too much on advise and miss something in game instead.
My point is, please take in a few lower skilled players, not in every game, but sometimes. When they PM you tell then that they will have to take advise from captain. If they aggree give advise, and accept the fact that they make a few mistakes, without biting their head off (that will only make them worse). If y got only one F-u-c-k-e-r on every team, in a 4v4 or 5v5 i guess it would level out.
Off course y are not playing CIV4 to be teachers - but on the other hand i thougt that the point of the ladder is that we play against other ladder players, and not only the player on our own skill level, and i must say im supprised to find out that it is more or less impossible to get into a REN-TEAMER unless you are lets call it "incrowd". I guess after doing this reply - it will be just a little bit harder that it allready is.
Might be an idear though to host some "low skill teamers" I think I will try that, and see if anyone joins.
GG - to y all, CU in lobby
|
|
|
Post by Magzi on May 31, 2006 6:33:49 GMT -5
Actually not a bad idea tamijo...maybe we can host some level 1 teamers and we can learn together
|
|
|
Post by tamijo on May 31, 2006 6:37:57 GMT -5
I will then Im often online from about 17.30 CET (11.30 AM EST) on weekdays and from 9.00 CET (3 AM EST) in weekends
if others will be interested
|
|
|
Post by GERMANIA on May 31, 2006 6:49:17 GMT -5
tamijo, you are right with your post and again you will be always welcome in a game if you are willing to learn
|
|
|
Post by churchill1 on May 31, 2006 9:45:07 GMT -5
hey tamijo, there are quite a few ladder teamers going on that are non-exclusive. i am starting to enjoy these kind.
|
|
|
Post by Lestat on May 31, 2006 9:51:56 GMT -5
Teamers don't really improve your win/loss %. With ctons only, i had a 37/3 win/loss ratio. It took me a very loooong time to improve that highest achieved win streak and skill ratio with teamers only. And win% will never be that good. Yesterday Hombre was +52 and i quess hes playing only teamers. Good job Hombre. About mine skill im nobb as i told. We have new member and post about noob are not in lader interest. Admin why u alow this crap???
|
|
|
Post by Hombre on May 31, 2006 10:06:37 GMT -5
Teamers don't really improve your win/loss %. With ctons only, i had a 37/3 win/loss ratio. It took me a very loooong time to improve that highest achieved win streak and skill ratio with teamers only. And win% will never be that good. Yesterday Hombre was +52 and i quess hes playing only teamers. Good job Hombre. About mine skill im nobb as i told. We have new member and post about noob are not in lader interest. Admin why u alow this crap??? Ty. My streak is mostly from teamers, at least the last 40 reports. Its just a coincidence, cause its really hard to be choosen on winner team so many times, so its just luck!!!! The incredible streak just in ctons is Aways streak. Thats not luck, thats skill.
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on May 31, 2006 11:32:32 GMT -5
Teamers don't really improve your win/loss %. With ctons only, i had a 37/3 win/loss ratio. It took me a very loooong time to improve that highest achieved win streak and skill ratio with teamers only. And win% will never be that good. Yesterday Hombre was +52 and i quess hes playing only teamers. Good job Hombre. About mine skill im nobb as i told. And i had +58 from teamers ONLY (almost all but maybe 1-2 were with top players so it wasn't just because of steamrolling some noobs). So your point is? It's all about luck anyway. In a month before this streak, i had 30 more losses than wins from the same teamers. We have new member and post about noob are not in lader interest. Admin why u alow this crap??? Note that you're commenting my post here. Which exact crap do you have in mind while saying it? By the way, you post significantly more bullsh it here, as it should be obvious to you from numerous comments of other people here.
|
|
|
Post by Lestat on May 31, 2006 11:53:47 GMT -5
Hard to read caerfuly? I quoted u onyl bc win%. Different matter is talking about noobs-TOPICS and I suggested that people which started it stop bc it is not in ladder interest. This topic started with names but author deleted it as me mine reply to him.
PS but who cares wot i talking just ignore me plz.
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on May 31, 2006 13:15:38 GMT -5
Hard to read caerfuly? I quoted u onyl bc win%. Different matter is talking about noobs-TOPICS and I suggested that people which started it stop bc it is not in ladder interest. This topic started with names but author deleted it as me mine reply to him. I'm reading carefully. You're not writing carefully. Then divide post on paragraphs. Or even better, with asteriks like that: quote reply *** your other thoughts
|
|
|
Post by Elledge on May 31, 2006 21:00:46 GMT -5
I don't get why Lestat is still a member on these forums. Half his posts I literally can't understand because his writing...well, makes no sense. A quarter of them make a really stupid point with big red text, and the other quarter are insulting people, or at least I think they are, but it takes five minutes to parse through them and figure it out because they are barely readable as well.
I don't remember seeing a single post by him that actually had any useful content at all. Prove me wrong?
|
|
|
Post by Hombre on Jun 1, 2006 3:10:21 GMT -5
I don't get why Lestat is still a member on these forums. Half his posts I literally can't understand because his writing...well, makes no sense. A quarter of them make a really stupid point with big red text, and the other quarter are insulting people, or at least I think they are, but it takes five minutes to parse through them and figure it out because they are barely readable as well. I don't remember seeing a single post by him that actually had any useful content at all. Prove me wrong? I dont understand why you want Lestat out these forum, exits something called freedom speech, you maybe have listened or readed about, maybe in some sci-fiction film in your country. Where i live (by the moment) everyone is free to say whatever he thinks, if people dont like what they are listening or reading they just have two options, dont read it or ignore it. Is that hard?
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on Jun 1, 2006 5:51:16 GMT -5
I don't get why Lestat is still a member on these forums. Half his posts I literally can't understand because his writing...well, makes no sense. A quarter of them make a really stupid point with big red text, and the other quarter are insulting people, or at least I think they are, but it takes five minutes to parse through them and figure it out because they are barely readable as well. I don't remember seeing a single post by him that actually had any useful content at all. Prove me wrong? I dont understand why you want Lestat out these forum, exits something called freedom speech, you maybe have listened or readed about, maybe in some sci-fiction film in your country. Where i live (by the moment) everyone is free to say whatever he thinks, if people dont like what they are listening or reading they just have two options, dont read it or ignore it. Is that hard? There is only one default answer to this bullsh it - if you don't like Elledge's post, just not read it or ignore it. Is it that hard?
|
|
|
Post by Hombre on Jun 1, 2006 5:52:47 GMT -5
I dont understand why you want Lestat out these forum, exits something called freedom speech, you maybe have listened or readed about, maybe in some sci-fiction film in your country. Where i live (by the moment) everyone is free to say whatever he thinks, if people dont like what they are listening or reading they just have two options, dont read it or ignore it. Is that hard? There is only one default answer to this bullsh it - if you don't like Elledge's post, just not read it or ignore it. Is it that hard? Nice to know you have understand my message.
|
|
|
Post by Ellestar on Jun 1, 2006 6:03:08 GMT -5
Yes, but accoring to your own words you had 2 choices: not read or ignore. You didn't use your own advice so your advice looks stupid after that. It's called a "catch 22" in English right?
Besides, freedom of speech on forums??? You're crazy. Do you know any unmoderated ones that look civil? Even then, i doubt that you'll find any civil unmoderated game forum.
|
|