|
Post by SirPartyMan on Nov 17, 2006 13:25:05 GMT -5
Perhaps I don't understand the objection. Several people posted last time that having team games with exactly the same leaders on both sides was boring and didn't give any advantage to the team ahead in the standings.
The game is 3v3. The civ picks alternate 1-2-1-2-1-2 betweem the two teams.
Sure it's a slight advantage to go first, but only slight. I don't think the "experts" here would even agree on who the 6 strongest civs are for such an event.
We can revisit this next time if it proves to be unbalanced. Moral of the story, do well on Friday's events to enhance your civ picking position on Saturday.
SPM
|
|
|
Post by Bantams on Nov 17, 2006 13:31:44 GMT -5
Civ Choice: yes, and the same LEADER cannot be chosen by both teams - picking order based on current standings Oh from the original post SPM it looked as though leaders were picked by rank and not in order of teams 1-2-1-2 etc I think people thought it was the highest ranked players that got the best leaders so if one team was full of high rankede players that team would have a advantage Thanks for claryfying this Bantams
|
|
|
Post by SirPartyMan on Nov 17, 2006 14:09:34 GMT -5
Yes this new rule only applies to 1 Saturday Event (#6 ancient teamer) and 1 Sunday Event (#10 classical teamer). Picking order is based on current standings and that team gets 1st, 3rd, and 5th civ pick, while other team gets 2nd, 4th, and 6th.
I think you'll find this introduces a new strategic element to teamers.
We'll see how it plays out and re-evaluate for next CCC.
Best, SPM
|
|
|
Post by venceslas on Nov 17, 2006 14:14:18 GMT -5
"Sure it's a slight advantage to go first, but only slight. I don't think the "experts" here would even agree on who the 6 strongest civs are for such an event. "
Sure SPM, but I'm pretty sure that our expert group will fully agree which one is the best.
chris.
|
|
|
Post by Polydeukes on Nov 17, 2006 14:37:39 GMT -5
Slight advantage Guys its c4f you will have every ressource close. Shaka is GOD, you will have a worker before anyone else will have a warrior. Complete joke
|
|
|
Post by whitebull on Nov 17, 2006 20:08:14 GMT -5
That's the point, to make this new rule less objected, ban shaka
|
|
|
Post by geforced on Nov 18, 2006 4:41:52 GMT -5
why is 3v3 ancient on c4f_tbg? thats bs
|
|
|
Post by Polydeukes on Nov 18, 2006 14:09:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tommynt on Nov 18, 2006 14:51:25 GMT -5
i suggested like 100 times standard tbf 4-4 and i have no clue why no1 listen to me
|
|
|
Post by churchill1 on Nov 18, 2006 18:32:31 GMT -5
hm someone explain to me why using the C4F map is so bad. I don't care either way TBH.
And why is my avatar censored?!? (if indeed it is)
|
|
|
Post by Canucksoldier on Nov 18, 2006 19:41:16 GMT -5
hm someone explain to me why using the C4F map is so bad. I don't care either way TBH. And why is my avatar censored?!? (if indeed it is) Your avatar is not censored, it must be a problem with the server you have hosting it, or it's no longer the proper URL. CS
|
|
|
Post by zzZhenon on Nov 19, 2006 1:06:07 GMT -5
Yeah your url is broken. Fix that nuts, i'm curious to know what it is
|
|
|
Post by Speaker on Nov 19, 2006 1:52:56 GMT -5
a 5v5 would be intersting IMO, considering 5v5 games are probally the most popular teamers, seems a bit of a shame not to have one. The Ren event has finally finished, at 1:52am EST, after 12 hours of play. God, I hope we never make this event 5v5.
|
|
|
Post by MookieNJ on Nov 19, 2006 1:57:11 GMT -5
a 5v5 would be intersting IMO, considering 5v5 games are probally the most popular teamers, seems a bit of a shame not to have one. The Ren event has finally finished, at 1:52am EST, after 12 hours of play. God, I hope we never make this event 5v5. When some games are taking 6 hours to complete in the 3v3 format, adding 4 more players into the game is not a good idea. 5v5 Ren is a great format -- for a one time game -- but its potential for lag and drawn out games makes it a terrible format for the CCC.
|
|
|
Post by Tony on Nov 19, 2006 8:38:20 GMT -5
maybe 5v5 ancient
5v5 ancient on blanced map works really well imo, as blanced is way tooo huge for 4v4
|
|
|
Post by fablo on Nov 19, 2006 10:27:36 GMT -5
This summer i made a poll in the french ladder site to know what people thought Materazzi said to Zidane in soccer final in Berlin..... Between the possible answers ( may i borrow your shampoo?, where is sternum?, etc....) the winner question was "do u wanna play a 5v5 ren instead penalty shots ? ;D
|
|
|
Post by Ascendancy on Nov 19, 2006 16:52:31 GMT -5
I would love to see only 8 people in the ironman finale next CCC. This time we started with 12 people, and we probarly lost atleast 4 hours due connection problems and lag. The lag issue is huge in games with 12 people compared to 8. So next time, please do a semi so it will only be 8 people in the finale
|
|
|
Post by Canucksoldier on Nov 19, 2006 23:09:15 GMT -5
I would love to see only 8 people in the ironman finale next CCC. This time we started with 12 people, and we probarly lost atleast 4 hours due connection problems and lag. The lag issue is huge in games with 12 people compared to 8. So next time, please do a semi so it will only be 8 people in the finale Well it was suppose to be only 10 and I will ensure that it will be max 10 next CCC. CS
|
|
|
Post by venceslas on Nov 20, 2006 2:48:42 GMT -5
One suggestion:
- Don't accept that player change the rules, I mean why MGT have been allowed to define the iroman's map? Maybe there is another explanation that I don't know(and I will be grateful to TD if he could explain me), but at this point it seems strange to me.
About the ironman qualification, like every clan can called a TD review, I think it's better to keep all the players in the lobby in order to be sure that no call is done.
chris.
|
|
|
Post by Bantams on Nov 20, 2006 3:05:25 GMT -5
This summer i made a poll in the french ladder site to know what people thought Materazzi said to Zidane in soccer final in Berlin..... Between the possible answers ( may i borrow your shampoo?, where is sternum?, etc....) the winner question was "do u wanna play a 5v5 ren instead penalty shots ? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Now thats funny
|
|